13 min read

Drata Alternatives: 5 Superior Options for Enterprise Compliance in 2025

Featured Image

Cybersecurity compliance is a critical requirement that directly impacts contracts, partnerships, and your organization’s ability to grow securely. Federal contracts hinge on it, enterprise clients expect it, and one security breach can unravel everything you’ve built.

With the global cybersecurity compliance market projected to hit $455.23 billion by 2034 (Fact.MR), your organization is likely already investing time and budget into tools that simplify certification. Drata often gets the spotlight as a leading compliance automation platform, but it's not always the best fit.

Lack of transparent pricing and limited managed services are just two reasons why many teams start looking elsewhere. If your organization is pursuing SOC 2, CMMC, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or a combination of frameworks, you may find that Drata doesn’t quite meet your needs or support structure.

This guide breaks down five strong Drata alternatives designed for complex enterprise environments like yours. Whether you're a fast-growing SaaS company or a government contractor, we’ll highlight the standout features, limitations, and ideal use cases for each platform, so you can make the right compliance decision for your organization.

Let’s start by discussing why you should consider Drata alternatives. 

Key Takeaways

  • BEMO stands out among Drata alternatives by offering fully managed compliance services with expert support.
  • Drata lacks transparent pricing and offers limited managed services, which can create challenges for resource-constrained organizations.
  • Choosing the right Drata alternative depends on your frameworks, budget, internal capabilities, and need for managed services.

Why Consider Drata Alternatives?

While Drata offers robust compliance automation capabilities, organizations often explore alternatives for several compelling reasons, with limited managed services, pricing transparency, and a lack of framework coverage often being cited.

Here’s why Drata may not be your best choice: 

  • Limited Managed Services: Drata primarily provides a self-service platform, requiring your team to handle much of the compliance work independently. For organizations without dedicated compliance experts, this can create significant challenges.
  • Pricing Transparency Issues: Many users report difficulties understanding Drata's complete cost structure, with potential unexpected fees as compliance needs grow.
  • Integration Limitations: While Drata offers numerous integrations, some organizations find gaps when connecting with specific enterprise systems or specialized tools.
  • Framework Coverage: Depending on your industry and requirements, you might need support for specific frameworks that Drata doesn't prioritize or fully support.
  • Customer Support Concerns: Some users report challenges with responsive support, particularly for complex compliance issues requiring fast resolution.

Let's examine the top alternatives that address these challenges while providing powerful compliance management capabilities.

Top 5 Drata Alternatives for Enterprise Compliance

Now that we know why Drata may not be your best choice for framework compliance, let’s look at five great Drata alternatives. 

1. BEMO: Fully Managed Compliance Solutions

BEMO homepage

BEMO sets itself apart from traditional compliance automation platforms like Drata by delivering a fully managed service model. Instead of providing only software tools, BEMO assigns dedicated teams of compliance professionals to guide your organization through every phase of the certification journey. 

This makes it an ideal solution for companies without in-house compliance expertise or those that would rather dedicate their internal resources to core business functions.

If your organization is navigating complex frameworks like CMMC, SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HIPAA, BEMO’s white-glove approach can reduce the operational burden and help you stay on track without needing to build a compliance team from scratch.

Key Features of BEMO

BEMO combines automation with human oversight to deliver a high-touch compliance experience. Here’s what you can expect:

End-to-End Compliance Management

BEMO provides dedicated compliance engineers who manage the entire certification process, from readiness assessments to final audits. This includes developing policies, mapping controls, collecting evidence, and meeting deadlines.

Coverage for Multiple Frameworks

Whether your organization is pursuing SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or CMMC certification, BEMO supports a broad range of regulatory frameworks. This makes it a great choice for companies with overlapping compliance obligations.

Automated Evidence Collection with Expert Review

The platform automates the gathering of evidence but includes human review for accuracy and completeness. This ensures nothing slips through the cracks before your audit.

Third-Party Audit Coordination

BEMO takes on the heavy lifting by coordinating directly with third-party auditors, including scheduling, documentation preparation, and audit-day support.

Real-Time Compliance Monitoring

Your organization receives continuous compliance monitoring, alerts, and remediation guidance, helping you stay audit-ready year-round—not just during certification windows.

Microsoft 365 E5 Security Licensing

BEMO uniquely includes Microsoft 365 E5 security licensing as part of its service package. This allows organizations to access robust security tools like Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Information Protection, and Secure Score improvements—directly aligned with compliance goals.

Whole BEMO Is Best For

BEMO is an excellent choice for:

  • Government contractors that must meet stringent CMMC requirements.
  • Organizations juggling multiple frameworks who want a unified, managed approach to compliance.
  • Companies lacking internal compliance teams that need expert-led guidance without hiring full-time staff.
  • Microsoft 365 users looking to maximize existing investments in security and compliance licensing.

Limitations to Consider

While BEMO offers a robust and personalized experience, it comes with a premium price tag. Organizations with limited budgets or those who prefer to manage compliance in-house may find entry-level costs higher than self-service platforms like Drata. 

However, the total cost of ownership may still be lower when considering the time, staffing, and oversight required for internal management.

2. Vanta: User-Friendly Compliance Automation

Vanta homepage

Vanta has earned its place as one of the most widely recognized compliance automation platforms on the market. 

Designed primarily for fast-moving SaaS companies and startups, Vanta focuses on simplifying security audits through automation and pre-built templates. Its appeal lies in its extensive integration ecosystem and streamlined setup for common frameworks like SOC 2 and ISO 27001.

That said, Vanta’s approach leans heavily on automation and self-service. While this can accelerate certain parts of the compliance process, it still requires organizations to manage much of the execution internally. For teams with limited compliance experience or those managing multiple frameworks, this self-directed approach may introduce more complexity than expected.

Key Features of Vanta

Vanta’s toolset is built around automation, integrations, and continuous compliance workflows. These are the platform’s core capabilities:

Extensive Integration Library

Vanta supports over 375 integrations across popular tools like AWS, GitHub, Google Workspace, and more. These integrations allow organizations to automatically collect evidence for compliance audits.

Pre-Built Policy Templates

The platform includes pre-written security policies and control frameworks, which can be customized to suit your organization’s needs. These templates aim to reduce the manual work involved in policy creation.

Continuous Compliance Monitoring

Vanta offers real-time visibility into your compliance status through automated checks and alerts. This allows internal teams to monitor progress and stay audit-ready throughout the year.

Centralized Dashboard

A user-friendly dashboard provides a central location to track tasks, manage users, and follow audit timelines. It’s designed to be approachable, even for non-technical users.

Support for Core Frameworks

Vanta supports key compliance standards, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR. However, support for more complex frameworks such as CMMC may require additional customization or external support.

Who Vanta Is Best For

Vanta is best suited for:

  • Tech startups and SaaS providers seeking a quick path to SOC 2 or ISO 27001 readiness.
  • Teams with in-house compliance or engineering resources who can manage setup and respond to alerts.
  • Organizations looking for a lower-cost, self-managed solution that integrates with existing tooling.

Vanta may appeal to companies early in their compliance journey or those who are already familiar with the audit process and can manage it with minimal outside assistance.

Limitations to Consider

Although Vanta’s automation features are attractive, there are some notable trade-offs to keep in mind:

  • Lack of Fully Managed Services: Unlike platforms that offer hands-on support or dedicated compliance engineers, Vanta expects your internal team to lead the process.
  • Limited Pricing Transparency: Public pricing details are not readily available, which can make initial budgeting difficult for prospective customers.
  • Support for Complex Frameworks: While suitable for mainstream standards, Vanta may not offer the depth required for frameworks like CMMC without third-party help.

3. Sprinto: Cost-Effective Compliance Management

Sprinto homepage

Sprinto markets itself as a streamlined, automation-first platform built for cloud-native businesses navigating their early compliance milestones. 

By offering affordability and support for over 20 frameworks, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR, Sprinto appeals to growing companies that want to move quickly through audits without investing heavily in managed services or internal compliance teams.

The platform’s integration capabilities, built-in training modules, and automation tools allow startups and scale-ups to accelerate audit preparation with minimal manual lift. 

However, Sprinto’s self-service approach may require internal oversight to manage controls, respond to alerts, and coordinate audit workflows, especially as compliance needs become more complex over time.

Key Features of Sprinto

Sprinto’s feature set is designed to simplify compliance workflows, automate manual tasks, and give visibility into security posture through centralized dashboards.

Streamlined Compliance Across Core Frameworks

Sprinto provides out-of-the-box programs for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and several others. These programs come pre-aligned with industry controls and can be activated with minimal configuration.

Automation-Driven Monitoring

The platform emphasizes continuous monitoring through automated evidence collection, role-based task assignment, and real-time alerts. This helps keep compliance on track without constant manual check-ins.

Risk Assessment and Vendor Management

Sprinto includes risk assessment tools for identifying gaps and assigning mitigation tasks. It also integrates vendor risk tracking into the same platform, helping teams manage third-party exposure more efficiently.

Built-In Security Training

Security awareness training and policy acknowledgment tracking are included, allowing companies to meet training requirements without needing a separate system.

Auditor Collaboration Tools

Sprinto offers in-platform auditor dashboards where evidence can be shared, reviewed, and approved in a centralized interface. This helps streamline audit readiness.

Who Sprinto Is Best For

Sprinto is a strong option for:

  • Startups and mid-size cloud companies that need to get compliant quickly without investing in expensive consulting services.
  • Organizations with basic in-house compliance knowledge that can manage audits with automation support.
  • Teams looking for a single tool to manage risk, training, documentation, and audit workflows.

For smaller organizations with limited budgets or early-stage compliance needs, Sprinto provides a practical entry point with enough automation to reduce day-to-day overhead.

Limitations to Consider

While Sprinto offers wide framework coverage and fast setup, some trade-offs come with its self-service model:

  • Fewer Integrations Than Larger Platforms: Sprinto integrates with 200+ tools, which is solid but still more limited than competitors like Vanta or Drata.
  • Limited Support for Complex Environments: Organizations managing multiple business units, advanced controls, or non-standard infrastructure may find the platform less flexible.
  • Less Specialized Oversight: Although Sprinto offers support, it lacks the deep, dedicated compliance engineering found in fully managed platforms. Much of the responsibility still falls on your internal team.

4. Scytale: AI-Powered Compliance

Scytale homepage

Scytale positions itself as a modern compliance automation platform that leverages artificial intelligence to reduce manual overhead. It’s designed for fast-moving SaaS companies that want to streamline security audits and minimize friction in the compliance process.

By combining automation with expert advisory services, Scytale appeals to organizations looking for an efficient, tech-forward way to prepare for audits without building large internal compliance teams.

While Scytale simplifies many elements of audit readiness, its approach remains primarily software-driven. Companies that require more structured oversight, or are managing highly regulated environments, may find its lighter-touch model more suited to earlier-stage compliance efforts rather than long-term operational maturity.

Key Features of Scytale

Scytale integrates automation and AI assistance into a single compliance platform aimed at accelerating audit timelines and improving clarity for compliance teams.

AI-Assisted Control Mapping

Scytale uses AI to map technical environments to security controls, reducing the manual effort involved in identifying and assigning compliance responsibilities.

Automated Evidence Collection and Validation

The platform continuously collects and verifies evidence from connected systems, minimizing manual intervention and supporting audit readiness with minimal disruption to your workflow.

Multi-Framework Control Mapping

Organizations managing multiple frameworks, such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI DSS, can take advantage of cross-mapping capabilities, which allow for shared controls across audits.

Continuous Compliance Monitoring

Real-time monitoring provides alerts when controls fall out of compliance, allowing internal teams to take corrective action before audit timelines are impacted.

Dedicated Customer Success Managers

Scytale assigns customer success managers to guide users through the setup and compliance process, though the platform does not offer fully managed compliance services.

Who Scytale Is Best For

Scytale is best suited for:

  • Cloud-based startups and growth-stage SaaS companies that want to automate compliance tasks and reduce manual tracking.
  • Teams with internal technical staff capable of managing alerts and resolving control issues without external help.
  • Organizations prioritizing audit speed and simplicity rather than deep, hands-on compliance management.

If your organization values automation and already has internal capacity to handle compliance decisions, Scytale may offer a faster route to certification.

Limitations to Consider

While Scytale offers innovative tools and AI-driven features, there are a few limitations worth noting:

  • Newer Market Presence: As a relatively new entrant in the compliance automation space, Scytale may not yet have the same enterprise track record as more established competitors.
  • Limited Hands-On Support: Scytale does not offer fully managed compliance services. Organizations without internal compliance experience may need to invest additional time or hire external consultants.
  • Scope for Complex Environments: While effective for standard frameworks, Scytale may require additional customization or oversight for high-complexity use cases, such as regulated industries or multi-entity operations.

5. Secureframe: Security-First Compliance Platform

Secureframe homepage


Secureframe markets itself as a security-first compliance platform, designed for companies looking to integrate compliance efforts more deeply with their broader cybersecurity posture. 

With automation at its core, the platform aims to simplify processes across frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and more. It also includes tools for continuous monitoring, vendor risk management, and policy distribution.

This software-centric approach works well for organizations with internal security expertise that want to centralize both risk and compliance functions. However, for businesses without dedicated teams, the platform’s capabilities may require a steeper learning curve and more internal coordination than some alternatives.

Key Features of Secureframe

Secureframe’s platform combines compliance automation with broader security workflows, helping your organization reduce redundancy and increase visibility.

Vendor Risk and Access Management

Secureframe includes features to assess vendor security, manage access controls, and monitor third-party risk continuously. These tools are useful for organizations dealing with a large vendor ecosystem.

Automated Evidence Collection

Like most leading platforms, Secureframe collects and stores compliance evidence automatically. This reduces administrative burden and helps teams prepare for audits more efficiently.

Security Questionnaire Automation

Secureframe’s Trust Center allows customers to automate the process of responding to security questionnaires, which can speed up procurement and sales cycles.

Policy Management and Distribution

The platform provides built-in policy templates and a centralized system for distributing updated security policies to internal stakeholders.

Broad Framework Coverage

Secureframe supports a wide range of compliance frameworks out of the box, with the ability to layer multiple programs and track shared controls through a unified dashboard.

Who Secureframe Is Best For

Secureframe is a good fit for:

  • Security-conscious organizations that want to align compliance efforts with broader risk management practices.
  • Companies with in-house security expertise who are equipped to make full use of the platform’s more technical capabilities.
  • Growth-stage startups and enterprises looking to streamline audits and reduce repetitive manual work through automation.

If your business has an internal security team and wants to scale its compliance posture efficiently, Secureframe offers a streamlined and feature-rich platform.

Limitations to Consider

Secureframe delivers strong automation features, but it’s not without its constraints:

  • Requires Internal Security Resources: To get the most out of Secureframe, your organization should have experienced security or compliance personnel in place to configure and maintain controls.
  • No Fully Managed Option: While the platform is robust, it’s ultimately a self-service solution. If your business needs hands-on support for audit coordination, control implementation, or evidence validation, you’ll need to manage or outsource that work separately.
  • Complex Setup for Smaller Teams: Companies with lean teams or limited compliance experience may find Secureframe’s broader feature set more complex to navigate without external help.

How to Choose the Right Drata Alternative

Choosing the best alternative to Drata requires more than just comparing feature lists. To find the right fit for your organization, you need to consider your team’s capabilities, compliance goals, budget, and future growth. Below, we break down five essential areas that will help guide your decision-making process.

Here’s how to choose the best Drata alternative: 

1. Assess Your Internal Resources

Start by taking a realistic look at your current compliance capacity.

If your organization lacks dedicated compliance professionals or time to manage complex tasks, a fully managed service like BEMO may be more effective than a tool that requires hands-on oversight. 

Self-service platforms often demand significant attention, from control mapping to audit preparation. 

Consider whether your staff has the necessary expertise to implement and maintain frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, or CMMC. If not, opting for a provider that offers human support and managed implementation may help avoid costly missteps.

2. Identify Required Compliance Frameworks

Different platforms offer varying degrees of support for specific frameworks. Understanding which certifications your organization needs is critical.

For example, government contractors must comply with CMMC to qualify for DoD contracts. SaaS providers typically require SOC 2 to build customer trust. Organizations with a global presence often pursue ISO 27001 to meet international expectations, while HIPAA remains essential for any business handling patient health information.

When comparing solutions, examine whether each platform includes tailored controls, pre-written policy templates, and support that aligns with your industry’s standards. A strong platform should not only support your current framework but also anticipate overlapping requirements across other certifications.

3. Consider Total Cost of Ownership

Look beyond the platform subscription price to evaluate the total cost:

  • Internal Resource Allocation: How many staff hours will be required?
  • Training Costs: Will your team need specialized training?
  • Implementation Timeline: How quickly do you need to achieve compliance?
  • Ongoing Maintenance: What's required to maintain compliance after certification?

A managed service with a higher subscription fee might actually offer lower total cost when considering the reduced internal resource requirements.

4. Evaluate Integration Capabilities

The ability of a compliance platform to integrate with your existing tech stack plays a significant role in reducing manual work and improving accuracy. 

A strong alternative to Drata should support direct connections with your core systems, including cloud providers such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. 

It should also integrate with identity management platforms like Okta or Azure Active Directory, human resources systems like BambooHR or Gusto, as well as development tools and code repositories. 

If you rely on endpoint detection and response software, seamless integration with those tools will enable continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection. 

Choosing a platform with robust integration capabilities ensures your compliance data stays current and requires less manual oversight.

5. Assess Scalability for Multiple Frameworks

As your organization grows, it’s likely that your compliance requirements will expand. This makes it essential to choose a platform that can support multiple frameworks at once. Look for solutions that allow you to manage several certifications simultaneously without duplicating effort. 

The best platforms provide efficient cross-mapping of controls, making it easier to satisfy overlapping requirements between standards like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and CMMC. 

It's also important to consider how the platform handles pricing as you scale, as adding more frameworks shouldn’t come with confusing or excessive costs. A scalable solution will help you keep pace with evolving regulatory demands without increasing operational complexity.

Why BEMO Stands Out Among Drata Alternatives

While each alternative offers unique advantages, BEMO delivers distinctive value as a fully managed compliance solution. Rather than simply providing software, BEMO combines automation technology with hands-on compliance expertise.

This approach addresses the most common compliance challenges:

  1. Expertise Gap: Many organizations lack specialized compliance knowledge, particularly for complex frameworks like CMMC or ISO 27001. BEMO provides dedicated compliance engineers who manage the entire process.
  2. Resource Constraints: Internal teams often struggle to balance compliance tasks with core responsibilities. BEMO's managed approach eliminates this burden, allowing your team to focus on strategic priorities.
  3. Audit Complexity: Navigating third-party audits requires specialized knowledge. BEMO coordinates directly with auditors, significantly reducing the stress and uncertainty of the audit process.
  4. Continuous Compliance: Maintaining compliance after certification is often overlooked. BEMO provides ongoing monitoring and remediation support to ensure sustained compliance.
  5. Integration Management: With BEMO, you don't need to worry about setting up and maintaining complex integrations. The expert team handles the technical implementation while ensuring comprehensive evidence collection.

For organizations looking to achieve compliance efficiently while minimizing internal resource allocation, BEMO's fully managed approach provides clear advantages over self-service platforms like Drata.

Choosing the Best Drata Alternative

While Drata offers powerful compliance automation capabilities, it represents just one approach to managing cybersecurity compliance. Organizations with complex requirements, limited internal resources, or accelerated compliance timelines often find greater success with alternatives, particularly managed services that combine automation with hands-on expertise.

By carefully evaluating your organization's specific needs against the strengths of each Drata alternative, you can select the compliance solution that delivers the most value while minimizing resource drain on your team.

For organizations prioritizing efficiency, expertise, and comprehensive support, BEMO's fully managed compliance services provide a compelling alternative to self-service platforms, helping you achieve and maintain certification with minimal internal effort.

Ready to simplify your compliance journey? Book a demo with BEMO today and discover how our fully managed approach can accelerate your path to certification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is the Main Drawback of Drata for Enterprises? 

Drata requires your internal team to manage most of the process and lacks transparent pricing for scaling frameworks.

Can BEMO Handle Multiple Frameworks Simultaneously? 

Yes, BEMO supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, CMMC, and HIPAA with shared control mapping and continuous oversight.

Does Sprinto Include Security Training Tools?

Yes, Sprinto includes built-in security awareness training and policy tracking to help satisfy compliance requirements.

Is Vanta Suitable for CMMC Compliance? 

Not entirely. Vanta focuses on SOC 2 and ISO 27001, so CMMC often requires external customization or support.

Do Any Platforms Offer Audit Coordination?

BEMO coordinates directly with third-party auditors, which helps reduce audit complexity and internal stress.

 

Sources

Leave us a comment!