Cybersecurity compliance is a critical requirement that directly impacts contracts, partnerships, and your organization’s ability to grow securely. Federal contracts hinge on it, enterprise clients expect it, and one security breach can unravel everything you’ve built.
With the global cybersecurity compliance market projected to hit $455.23 billion by 2034 (Fact.MR), your organization is likely already investing time and budget into tools that simplify certification. Drata often gets the spotlight as a leading compliance automation platform, but it's not always the best fit.
Lack of transparent pricing and limited managed services are just two reasons why many teams start looking elsewhere. If your organization is pursuing SOC 2, CMMC, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or a combination of frameworks, you may find that Drata doesn’t quite meet your needs or support structure.
This guide breaks down five strong Drata alternatives designed for complex enterprise environments like yours. Whether you're a fast-growing SaaS company or a government contractor, we’ll highlight the standout features, limitations, and ideal use cases for each platform, so you can make the right compliance decision for your organization.
Let’s start by discussing why you should consider Drata alternatives.
While Drata offers robust compliance automation capabilities, organizations often explore alternatives for several compelling reasons, with limited managed services, pricing transparency, and a lack of framework coverage often being cited.
Here’s why Drata may not be your best choice:
Let's examine the top alternatives that address these challenges while providing powerful compliance management capabilities.
Now that we know why Drata may not be your best choice for framework compliance, let’s look at five great Drata alternatives.
BEMO sets itself apart from traditional compliance automation platforms like Drata by delivering a fully managed service model. Instead of providing only software tools, BEMO assigns dedicated teams of compliance professionals to guide your organization through every phase of the certification journey.
This makes it an ideal solution for companies without in-house compliance expertise or those that would rather dedicate their internal resources to core business functions.
If your organization is navigating complex frameworks like CMMC, SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HIPAA, BEMO’s white-glove approach can reduce the operational burden and help you stay on track without needing to build a compliance team from scratch.
BEMO combines automation with human oversight to deliver a high-touch compliance experience. Here’s what you can expect:
BEMO provides dedicated compliance engineers who manage the entire certification process, from readiness assessments to final audits. This includes developing policies, mapping controls, collecting evidence, and meeting deadlines.
Whether your organization is pursuing SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or CMMC certification, BEMO supports a broad range of regulatory frameworks. This makes it a great choice for companies with overlapping compliance obligations.
The platform automates the gathering of evidence but includes human review for accuracy and completeness. This ensures nothing slips through the cracks before your audit.
BEMO takes on the heavy lifting by coordinating directly with third-party auditors, including scheduling, documentation preparation, and audit-day support.
Your organization receives continuous compliance monitoring, alerts, and remediation guidance, helping you stay audit-ready year-round—not just during certification windows.
BEMO uniquely includes Microsoft 365 E5 security licensing as part of its service package. This allows organizations to access robust security tools like Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Information Protection, and Secure Score improvements—directly aligned with compliance goals.
BEMO is an excellent choice for:
While BEMO offers a robust and personalized experience, it comes with a premium price tag. Organizations with limited budgets or those who prefer to manage compliance in-house may find entry-level costs higher than self-service platforms like Drata.
However, the total cost of ownership may still be lower when considering the time, staffing, and oversight required for internal management.
Vanta has earned its place as one of the most widely recognized compliance automation platforms on the market.
Designed primarily for fast-moving SaaS companies and startups, Vanta focuses on simplifying security audits through automation and pre-built templates. Its appeal lies in its extensive integration ecosystem and streamlined setup for common frameworks like SOC 2 and ISO 27001.
That said, Vanta’s approach leans heavily on automation and self-service. While this can accelerate certain parts of the compliance process, it still requires organizations to manage much of the execution internally. For teams with limited compliance experience or those managing multiple frameworks, this self-directed approach may introduce more complexity than expected.
Vanta’s toolset is built around automation, integrations, and continuous compliance workflows. These are the platform’s core capabilities:
Vanta supports over 375 integrations across popular tools like AWS, GitHub, Google Workspace, and more. These integrations allow organizations to automatically collect evidence for compliance audits.
The platform includes pre-written security policies and control frameworks, which can be customized to suit your organization’s needs. These templates aim to reduce the manual work involved in policy creation.
Vanta offers real-time visibility into your compliance status through automated checks and alerts. This allows internal teams to monitor progress and stay audit-ready throughout the year.
A user-friendly dashboard provides a central location to track tasks, manage users, and follow audit timelines. It’s designed to be approachable, even for non-technical users.
Vanta supports key compliance standards, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR. However, support for more complex frameworks such as CMMC may require additional customization or external support.
Vanta is best suited for:
Vanta may appeal to companies early in their compliance journey or those who are already familiar with the audit process and can manage it with minimal outside assistance.
Although Vanta’s automation features are attractive, there are some notable trade-offs to keep in mind:
Sprinto markets itself as a streamlined, automation-first platform built for cloud-native businesses navigating their early compliance milestones.
By offering affordability and support for over 20 frameworks, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR, Sprinto appeals to growing companies that want to move quickly through audits without investing heavily in managed services or internal compliance teams.
The platform’s integration capabilities, built-in training modules, and automation tools allow startups and scale-ups to accelerate audit preparation with minimal manual lift.
However, Sprinto’s self-service approach may require internal oversight to manage controls, respond to alerts, and coordinate audit workflows, especially as compliance needs become more complex over time.
Sprinto’s feature set is designed to simplify compliance workflows, automate manual tasks, and give visibility into security posture through centralized dashboards.
Sprinto provides out-of-the-box programs for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and several others. These programs come pre-aligned with industry controls and can be activated with minimal configuration.
The platform emphasizes continuous monitoring through automated evidence collection, role-based task assignment, and real-time alerts. This helps keep compliance on track without constant manual check-ins.
Sprinto includes risk assessment tools for identifying gaps and assigning mitigation tasks. It also integrates vendor risk tracking into the same platform, helping teams manage third-party exposure more efficiently.
Security awareness training and policy acknowledgment tracking are included, allowing companies to meet training requirements without needing a separate system.
Sprinto offers in-platform auditor dashboards where evidence can be shared, reviewed, and approved in a centralized interface. This helps streamline audit readiness.
Sprinto is a strong option for:
For smaller organizations with limited budgets or early-stage compliance needs, Sprinto provides a practical entry point with enough automation to reduce day-to-day overhead.
While Sprinto offers wide framework coverage and fast setup, some trade-offs come with its self-service model:
Scytale positions itself as a modern compliance automation platform that leverages artificial intelligence to reduce manual overhead. It’s designed for fast-moving SaaS companies that want to streamline security audits and minimize friction in the compliance process.
By combining automation with expert advisory services, Scytale appeals to organizations looking for an efficient, tech-forward way to prepare for audits without building large internal compliance teams.
While Scytale simplifies many elements of audit readiness, its approach remains primarily software-driven. Companies that require more structured oversight, or are managing highly regulated environments, may find its lighter-touch model more suited to earlier-stage compliance efforts rather than long-term operational maturity.
Scytale integrates automation and AI assistance into a single compliance platform aimed at accelerating audit timelines and improving clarity for compliance teams.
Scytale uses AI to map technical environments to security controls, reducing the manual effort involved in identifying and assigning compliance responsibilities.
The platform continuously collects and verifies evidence from connected systems, minimizing manual intervention and supporting audit readiness with minimal disruption to your workflow.
Organizations managing multiple frameworks, such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI DSS, can take advantage of cross-mapping capabilities, which allow for shared controls across audits.
Real-time monitoring provides alerts when controls fall out of compliance, allowing internal teams to take corrective action before audit timelines are impacted.
Scytale assigns customer success managers to guide users through the setup and compliance process, though the platform does not offer fully managed compliance services.
Scytale is best suited for:
If your organization values automation and already has internal capacity to handle compliance decisions, Scytale may offer a faster route to certification.
While Scytale offers innovative tools and AI-driven features, there are a few limitations worth noting:
Secureframe markets itself as a security-first compliance platform, designed for companies looking to integrate compliance efforts more deeply with their broader cybersecurity posture.
With automation at its core, the platform aims to simplify processes across frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and more. It also includes tools for continuous monitoring, vendor risk management, and policy distribution.
This software-centric approach works well for organizations with internal security expertise that want to centralize both risk and compliance functions. However, for businesses without dedicated teams, the platform’s capabilities may require a steeper learning curve and more internal coordination than some alternatives.
Secureframe’s platform combines compliance automation with broader security workflows, helping your organization reduce redundancy and increase visibility.
Secureframe includes features to assess vendor security, manage access controls, and monitor third-party risk continuously. These tools are useful for organizations dealing with a large vendor ecosystem.
Like most leading platforms, Secureframe collects and stores compliance evidence automatically. This reduces administrative burden and helps teams prepare for audits more efficiently.
Secureframe’s Trust Center allows customers to automate the process of responding to security questionnaires, which can speed up procurement and sales cycles.
The platform provides built-in policy templates and a centralized system for distributing updated security policies to internal stakeholders.
Secureframe supports a wide range of compliance frameworks out of the box, with the ability to layer multiple programs and track shared controls through a unified dashboard.
Secureframe is a good fit for:
If your business has an internal security team and wants to scale its compliance posture efficiently, Secureframe offers a streamlined and feature-rich platform.
Secureframe delivers strong automation features, but it’s not without its constraints:
Choosing the best alternative to Drata requires more than just comparing feature lists. To find the right fit for your organization, you need to consider your team’s capabilities, compliance goals, budget, and future growth. Below, we break down five essential areas that will help guide your decision-making process.
Here’s how to choose the best Drata alternative:
Start by taking a realistic look at your current compliance capacity.
If your organization lacks dedicated compliance professionals or time to manage complex tasks, a fully managed service like BEMO may be more effective than a tool that requires hands-on oversight.
Self-service platforms often demand significant attention, from control mapping to audit preparation.
Consider whether your staff has the necessary expertise to implement and maintain frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, or CMMC. If not, opting for a provider that offers human support and managed implementation may help avoid costly missteps.
Different platforms offer varying degrees of support for specific frameworks. Understanding which certifications your organization needs is critical.
For example, government contractors must comply with CMMC to qualify for DoD contracts. SaaS providers typically require SOC 2 to build customer trust. Organizations with a global presence often pursue ISO 27001 to meet international expectations, while HIPAA remains essential for any business handling patient health information.
When comparing solutions, examine whether each platform includes tailored controls, pre-written policy templates, and support that aligns with your industry’s standards. A strong platform should not only support your current framework but also anticipate overlapping requirements across other certifications.
Look beyond the platform subscription price to evaluate the total cost:
A managed service with a higher subscription fee might actually offer lower total cost when considering the reduced internal resource requirements.
The ability of a compliance platform to integrate with your existing tech stack plays a significant role in reducing manual work and improving accuracy.
A strong alternative to Drata should support direct connections with your core systems, including cloud providers such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud.
It should also integrate with identity management platforms like Okta or Azure Active Directory, human resources systems like BambooHR or Gusto, as well as development tools and code repositories.
If you rely on endpoint detection and response software, seamless integration with those tools will enable continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection.
Choosing a platform with robust integration capabilities ensures your compliance data stays current and requires less manual oversight.
As your organization grows, it’s likely that your compliance requirements will expand. This makes it essential to choose a platform that can support multiple frameworks at once. Look for solutions that allow you to manage several certifications simultaneously without duplicating effort.
The best platforms provide efficient cross-mapping of controls, making it easier to satisfy overlapping requirements between standards like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and CMMC.
It's also important to consider how the platform handles pricing as you scale, as adding more frameworks shouldn’t come with confusing or excessive costs. A scalable solution will help you keep pace with evolving regulatory demands without increasing operational complexity.
While each alternative offers unique advantages, BEMO delivers distinctive value as a fully managed compliance solution. Rather than simply providing software, BEMO combines automation technology with hands-on compliance expertise.
This approach addresses the most common compliance challenges:
For organizations looking to achieve compliance efficiently while minimizing internal resource allocation, BEMO's fully managed approach provides clear advantages over self-service platforms like Drata.
While Drata offers powerful compliance automation capabilities, it represents just one approach to managing cybersecurity compliance. Organizations with complex requirements, limited internal resources, or accelerated compliance timelines often find greater success with alternatives, particularly managed services that combine automation with hands-on expertise.
By carefully evaluating your organization's specific needs against the strengths of each Drata alternative, you can select the compliance solution that delivers the most value while minimizing resource drain on your team.
For organizations prioritizing efficiency, expertise, and comprehensive support, BEMO's fully managed compliance services provide a compelling alternative to self-service platforms, helping you achieve and maintain certification with minimal internal effort.
Ready to simplify your compliance journey? Book a demo with BEMO today and discover how our fully managed approach can accelerate your path to certification.
Drata requires your internal team to manage most of the process and lacks transparent pricing for scaling frameworks.
Yes, BEMO supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, CMMC, and HIPAA with shared control mapping and continuous oversight.
Yes, Sprinto includes built-in security awareness training and policy tracking to help satisfy compliance requirements.
Not entirely. Vanta focuses on SOC 2 and ISO 27001, so CMMC often requires external customization or support.
BEMO coordinates directly with third-party auditors, which helps reduce audit complexity and internal stress.