Quick Answer: BEMO is the top pick for US companies on Microsoft 365 that need managed Vanta implementation. We are a certified Vanta partner, and our team handles IT, security, evidence collection and auditor coordination.
You bought Vanta because a customer asked for a SOC 2 report. The dashboard lit up, the integrations connected, and then the failing controls appeared.
Many teams seek help at this point. Vanta is working, but nobody has time to fix the problems it finds.
Here, we compare the best cybersecurity firms for Vanta implementation, their services and typical timelines. The aim is to help you choose who will do the work.
BEMO published this guide and we're in the ranking below. We are a Vanta partner and a Drata partner. The criteria come first, and the sections that follow say where we're the wrong choice.
Short on time? Speak with us and we'll tell you which failing controls are actually blocking your report, and how long the fix takes.
BEMO, Workstreet, Kobalt.io, BD Emerson and Cyberfort offer different approaches to Vanta implementation. Compare their delivery models and the teams they serve.
|
Firm |
Model |
Best fit |
|---|---|---|
|
Microsoft-native, fully managed IT, security and compliance |
SMBs on Microsoft 365 with no in-house compliance staff |
|
|
Workstreet |
Automation-first, high-volume implementation |
Startups seeking speed and volume-tested work |
|
Kobalt.io |
End-to-end implementation across several frameworks |
Teams needing SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA or GDPR together |
|
BD Emerson |
Advisory-led GRC, privacy and due diligence |
Teams wanting strategic advisory alongside setup |
|
Cyberfort |
GRC consultancy, regulatory framework mapping |
Organizations leading with governance and risk |
A Vanta implementation firm configures your environment, writes policies, prepares evidence and coordinates with your auditor.
Vanta SOC 2 automation connects to your tools, maps controls and flags failures continuously. Your provider or internal team still needs to fix those failures.
The implementation work covers identity, devices and data protection. It also includes policies and evidence that integrations cannot collect.
To tell the difference, ask what happens when Vanta flags a failing control: an advisory firm opens a ticket for your team to fix, whereas an implementation firm reconfigures the policy for you.
Vanta tracks controls and collects evidence through integrations. Your team or provider still owns configuration, policies and the audit work.
|
Vanta handles |
Someone still has to |
|---|---|
|
Mapping controls to the Trust Services Criteria |
Decide which criteria are in scope for your service |
|
Continuous monitoring and failing-control alerts |
Configure the environment so the controls pass |
|
Evidence collection through integrations |
Produce evidence for anything not integrated |
|
Policy templates |
Write, approve and enforce the actual policies |
|
Audit readiness views |
Select the auditor and run the fieldwork with them |
The mandatory Security criterion carries 33 Common Criteria across nine categories. Availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy depend on what you deliver to customers.
Auditors want documented evidence for every control across the whole observation period. Collecting it manually is slow and error-prone.
Vanta implementation time typically runs 3 to 6 months for SOC 2 Type 1. Type 2 adds a 6 to 12 month observation window.
|
Path |
Typical duration |
|---|---|
|
SOC 2 Type 1 |
3 to 6 months |
|
SOC 2 Type 2 |
Type 1 work plus a 6 to 12 month observation window |
|
Managed implementation with a partner |
Around 8 months to initial compliance |
|
Fully in-house, platform only |
12 to 18 months or longer |
Managed delivery gives the work a named owner. In-house delivery competes with the team's other responsibilities.
Several key factors determine how quickly or slowly your Vanta implementation progresses:
Addressing these factors early helps ensure a smoother, more predictable implementation timeline.
We compared firms on six criteria, with partner status and environment ownership carrying the most weight.
By evaluating each provider across these core criteria, we deliver an objective comparison based on actual service delivery rather than promotional claims.
Here are the best cybersecurity firms for Vanta implementation.
BEMO is a certified Vanta partner.
We connect Vanta to Microsoft 365, identity, device management, HR, security and cloud tools. Our team then runs the systems your audit depends on.
You work with a named Customer Success Manager, Security Engineer and Compliance Engineer. A CISO joins quarterly reviews.
Evidence cleanup and auditor coordination are included rather than billed as extras.
We price engagements by headcount rather than project. This suits teams looking for a predictable monthly cost.
Best for: US companies on Microsoft 365, from startup size up to roughly 500 employees. They have a contractual compliance requirement and no internal compliance staff.
Not for: teams unwilling to move to Microsoft, or those with engineers who only need advisory support.
Workstreet positions itself as Vanta's number one MSP. Its high-volume, automation-first approach targets fast-moving startups.
Its marketing emphasizes days rather than weeks. Ask what starting conditions that assumes before treating it as your timeline.
Best for: venture-backed startups that need a SOC 2 report to unblock a deal and have a clean, cloud-native environment.
Not for: companies with legacy on-premises systems or a large remediation backlog that limits speed.
Kobalt.io markets itself as the number one Vanta service partner and covers SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPR end to end.
Using one firm for two or three frameworks avoids duplicated control work.
Best for: teams with international customers and several frameworks landing in the same year.
Not for: a single-framework SOC 2 project that would pay for unused capacity.
BD Emerson combines consulting-led Vanta implementation with broader GRC, privacy and due diligence work.
Its Vanta implementation page ranks strongest among single-firm pages for this topic. It includes a step-by-step integration process and client testimonials.
Best for: teams that want strategic advisory, privacy work or transaction due diligence alongside the Vanta setup.
Not for: teams needing hands-on configuration rather than advisory support.
Cyberfort is a GRC consultancy in Vanta's service partner program, strong on mapping regulatory frameworks to controls.
Best for: organizations focused on governance and risk, especially regulated sectors with difficult framework mapping.
Not for: a lean engineering team that needs someone to configure Entra ID and Intune this month.
Vanta implementation follows four stages: assess gaps, plan remediation, deploy controls and complete the audit. This Vanta SOC 2 implementation guide covers each stage and the ongoing work.
A Vanta SOC 2 implementation guide should also explain who maintains evidence after setup. The work still needs an owner in month eleven.
Your SOC 2 requirements determine which controls to implement. The differences between SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 shape your audit plan.
Choose a Vanta implementation firm based on what it will manage, who works with your auditor and what support continues after setup.
Check partner credentials. Confirm the firm's certification and tier in Vanta's partner finder.
Confirm who fixes failing controls. Ask whether the firm makes changes or sends instructions to your team.
Clarify auditor support. Find out who handles evidence requests and questions during fieldwork.
Check what happens after setup. Agree who collects evidence throughout the observation window.
Plan for other frameworks. If ISO 27001 is next, ask whether the firm handles both. Vanta ISO 27001 support lets you use the same platform for that work.
Choose DIY, platform-only or managed implementation based on your team's time, experience and ability to own the work.
|
Path |
Who does the work |
Realistic timeline |
|---|---|---|
|
Fully DIY |
Your team, with no platform automation |
12 to 18 months or longer |
|
Platform only |
Vanta monitors, your team configures and remediates |
Faster than DIY, still bounded by your capacity |
|
Managed partner |
The firm configures, remediates and coordinates the audit |
Around 8 months to initial compliance |
Platform only can work when your security engineer has capacity and your environment needs limited remediation.
Budget for licensing and SOC 2 audit costs separately. Confirm who needs SOC 2 certification before committing to the work.
In-house Vanta implementations stall when nobody owns remediation, evidence collection or policy updates. These are the four problems that keep coming up:
Managed implementation gives this work an owner who is still accountable in month nine.
Vanta vs Drata implementation ease depends on your environment and who handles remediation. The platform alone does not decide the timeline.
Both map controls to the Trust Services Criteria and automate evidence collection. Your team or provider still handles configuration and policies.
We partner with both Vanta and Drata and don’t have preference on one over the other. Choose based on your auditor's requirements and the platform your team will use.
Then confirm who will fix the gaps. The same staffing problems can stall an implementation on either platform.
The best cybersecurity firms for Vanta implementation take responsibility for the work behind the dashboard. Confirm who fixes controls, collects evidence and works with your auditor.
We help US companies on Microsoft 365 that need a SOC 2 report and have no internal compliance team. Our named team manages the environment Vanta monitors.
If your engineer has capacity and your environment is already well configured, platform only is cheaper and can work.
If you need implementation and ongoing support, bring us your customer's security requirements and an overview of your environment. We'll help you establish the scope, timeline and work involved.
Book a Vanta scoping call with us.
Vanta implementation for SOC 2 Type 1 takes 3 to 6 months. Type 2 adds a 6 to 12 month observation window. Managed delivery typically reaches initial compliance in around 8 months. Fully in-house work takes 12 to 18 months or longer.
Vanta implementation costs depend on headcount, remediation needs, and setup-only or ongoing support. Pay licensing to Vanta and the separate auditor fee to the audit firm, not your implementation partner.
Vanta partner certification is not legally required. Certified partners get training, support channels and early access to product changes. Check a firm's status on Vanta's partner finder in under a minute.
Vanta flags failing controls. It does not configure your environment, write policies, or coordinate with your auditor. If your team lacks time for that work, you will often need an implementation firm.
SOC 2 Type 1 is a faster, point-in-time report for deals awaiting evidence. Type 2 covers a 6 to 12 month observation window and is what most enterprise buyers eventually request. Many teams complete Type 1 first, then Type 2.
Vanta and Drata both map controls to the Trust Services Criteria and automate evidence collection. Your environment and remediation capacity determine the timeline. BEMO partners with both, so the choice depends on your auditor and team.